|
|
Download Standards Here
Introduction to the Revised Programmatic Standards and Ethics
Sue Flohr, NAPPP, then NPHA Board Member, Chair,
Programmatic Standards Review Committee, CPPE
The update of the NAPPP, formerly NAPP/NPHA, Programmatic Standards and Ethics are the result of a
Presidential priority of former President Dr. Randy Black; Dr. Black felt
that the Programmatic Standards and Ethics are the cornerstone or sine qua non
of peer helping and NAPPP and that it was imperative that the Programmatic
Standards and Ethics be current and reflect the 'best practices/processes' of
peer helpings for others to follow who were either developing or continuing to
operate peer helping programs nationally and internationally; Dr. Black also
believes that the Programmatic Standards and Ethics are what distinguishes NAPPP
from other organizations, bodies, or agencies that are advocates of peer helping
and peer helping programs. A meta-analysis has shown that programs that follow
the NAPPP Programmatic Standards and Ethics are more efficacious and often when
programs are ineffective it is due a program implementation error (known as a
type III error) due to not following or adhering to the Programmatic Standards
and Ethics; Dr. Black appointment me to lead a blue-ribbon committee to revise
the Programmatic Standards and Ethics according the best practices known in peer
helping today. Before I describe the process that was used to revised the
Programmatic Standards and Ethics, I would like to recount the history of the
initial development of the Programmatic Standards and Ethics more than a decade ago.
In preparing to introduce you to the revised edition of
NAPPP's Programmatic Standards and Ethics, I read Volume 7, No. 4 of the PFQ
published in June of 1990. It was the "Special Issue" written to debut the
original Standards and Ethics. Dr. Judith Tindall was the guest editor. She told
about the 2 1/2-year process of creating the Standards and Ethics and recognized
the individuals who toiled with her. Twelve years later, many of those
contributors are still very active in NAPPP. I am grateful to them for creating
an outstanding document. So outstanding, that when the Programmatic Standards
and Ethics Committee asked for suggested revisions from established
practitioners from across the country, many responded with comments about how
functional and sound they are. Most had no suggestions for changes!
However, there were things that needed to be changed. The
Board of Directors and the Standards and Ethics Committee join me in expressing
our appreciation for those peer helping professionals who did respond with
suggestions--both in writing and at the work sessions at the Kansas City
conference. We hope that you will see your impact. Our expectation is that all
NAPPP members will find this revised edition to be even more functional as we
strive for excellence in our peer helping programs.
Dr. Barbara Varenhorst was the president of NAPP when the
Standards and Ethics were published. I read her "President's Column" in the same
issue of the PFQ. She wrote, "A Code of Ethics and Standards may seem
like dry reading and something to be filed away and forgotten." She listed
several reasons why this must not be true for the NAPPP Ethics and Standards.
Fortunately, some of her reasons are no longer applicable because of the
tremendous strength the Standards have given to peer-helping programs that have
utilized them. The NAPPP Standards and Ethics have helped our communities and
schools realize that we are serious, essential programs that empower individuals
to help others. However, one reason that Dr. Varenhorst listed remains as an
essential reason that these Standards and Ethics must never be filed and
forgotten. She stated,
"It is essential that these Standards and Ethics become our working papers in
designing, monitoring, evaluating and improving our peer helping programs. If
not, increasingly we will become more vulnerable to critics and exposed to
attacks of questionable validity. Although we may not all benefit from the
existence of excellent programs, all of us will suffer in the shadow of those
that are weak or ineffective."
I urge you to carefully read over the new Programmatic
Standards and Ethics. Discuss them with your colleagues and with your peer
helpers. Attend one of the Standards and Ethics workshops offered at our annual
conference. We will be anxious to hear what you think and to get
your input as to how we can continue to keep this document current and
effective.
|